From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Rome City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 2002
298 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

CA 02-00438

October 1, 2002.

Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Oneida County (Ringrose, J.), entered April 30, 2001, which denied defendant's motion to set aside the verdict.

THE MILLS LAW FIRM, CLIFTON PARK (GREGORY S. MILLS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PETER J. DI GIORGIO, JR., UTICA, FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., WISNER, SCUDDER, BURNS, AND GORSKI, JJ.


ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal be and the same hereby is NEXTWRTG unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v. Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn Queens, 155 A.D.2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).


Summaries of

Peters v. Rome City School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 2002
298 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Peters v. Rome City School District

Case Details

Full title:TAMELA M. PETERS, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF CHRISTOPHER M. SMITH…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 864 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 77