From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-00074 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 16, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-cv-00074

04-16-2012

BERNARD FITZGERALD PETERS Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Judge Nixon

Magistrate Judge Griffin


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Commissioner of Social Security's Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Sentence Four, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), with Remand to Defendant ("Motion") (Doc. No. 9), filed along with a Memorandum in Support (Doc. No. 10). Defendant states that remand is necessary "for a new hearing for, among other things, further evaluation of [Plaintiff Bernard Fizgerald Peters's] residual functional capacity." (Id. at 1.) Defendant indicates that Plaintiff's counsel has been contacted and has no objection to Defendant's Motion. (Doc. No. 9 at 1.)

The Court hereby GRANTS Defendant's Motion and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner. This Order terminates this Court's jurisdiction over the above-styled action, and the case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case.

It is so ORDERED.

__________________________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Peters v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Apr 16, 2012
No. 3:12-cv-00074 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 16, 2012)
Case details for

Peters v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD FITZGERALD PETERS Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 16, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-cv-00074 (M.D. Tenn. Apr. 16, 2012)