From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peters v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 20, 2012
6: 11-cv-00434-TC (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2012)

Opinion

6: 11-cv-00434-TC

08-20-2012

WILLIAM C. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Defendant.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on July 20, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation. The Commissioner's final decision is reversed and this case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the court's findings and recommendation. The clerk of court will enter judgment accordingly.

_________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Peters v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 20, 2012
6: 11-cv-00434-TC (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Peters v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM C. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 20, 2012

Citations

6: 11-cv-00434-TC (D. Or. Aug. 20, 2012)