From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pete Contreras v. Wray

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 30, 2022
CV 21-9797-JVS (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-9797-JVS (JPR)

08-30-2022

PETE CONTRERAS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, the other records on file herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has made a de novo review of all objections. The Court accepts the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted.

2. Defendant Pulido's motion to dismiss is granted, and the claims against him are dismissed with prejudice.

3. Defendants Obasohan, Vega, the City of Los Angeles, and Melekian are dismissed from this lawsuit for failure to serve and to prosecute.

4. The clerk should serve this Order on all counsel or parties of record.


Summaries of

Pete Contreras v. Wray

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 30, 2022
CV 21-9797-JVS (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Pete Contreras v. Wray

Case Details

Full title:PETE CONTRERAS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 30, 2022

Citations

CV 21-9797-JVS (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2022)