From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perry v. Clark

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 18, 2015
CV 07-6903-DMG(CW) (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2015)

Opinion

          Manuel Perry, Petitioner, Pro se, Corcoran, CA.

          For Ken Clark, Warden, Respondent: Stacy S Schwartz, LEAD ATTORNEY, California Attorney General Office, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          DOLLY M. GEE, United States District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No written Objections to the Report have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied and the action dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Perry v. Clark

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
May 18, 2015
CV 07-6903-DMG(CW) (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Perry v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL PERRY, Petitioner, v. KEN CLARK, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: May 18, 2015

Citations

CV 07-6903-DMG(CW) (C.D. Cal. May. 18, 2015)