From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perrotte v. Muntz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 16, 2015
No. ED CV 07-01031-MWF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015)

Opinion

No. ED CV 07-01031-MWF (VBK)

03-16-2015

JEFFREY P. PERROTTE, Plaintiff, v. M. MUNTZ, et al., Defendant.


ORDER (1) ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS AND (3) DISMISSING THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint and all other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation. Further, the Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Plaintiff has objected.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that an Order be entered (1) accepting the findings and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge; (2) granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint; and (3) entering Judgment dismissing the Third Amended Complaint with prejudice. DATED: March 16, 2015

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Perrotte v. Muntz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 16, 2015
No. ED CV 07-01031-MWF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015)
Case details for

Perrotte v. Muntz

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY P. PERROTTE, Plaintiff, v. M. MUNTZ, et al., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 16, 2015

Citations

No. ED CV 07-01031-MWF (VBK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2015)