From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perritt v. Jenkins

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 11, 2011
Case No. 4:11-CV-23 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2011)

Summary

noting that although it was not clear how the testimony of each witness would be relevant to the case, the court still determined that the witnesses identified appeared to have some relevance to the subject matter of the dispute

Summary of this case from Loeb-Defever v. Strategic Constr., Ltd.

Opinion

Case No. 4:11-CV-23

08-11-2011

RICKY B. PERRITT, Individually; THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; BUSTER BAKING, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company; and THE WOODLANDS BAKING, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, v. PAMELA F. JENKINS, Individually; and THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company.


Judge Schneider/Judge Mazzant

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On July 18, 2011, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Pamela F. Jenkins and The Cupcakery, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company's Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division (Dkt. #24) should be denied.

Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Pamela F. Jenkins and The Cupcakery, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company's Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division (Dkt. #24) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Perritt v. Jenkins

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Aug 11, 2011
Case No. 4:11-CV-23 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2011)

noting that although it was not clear how the testimony of each witness would be relevant to the case, the court still determined that the witnesses identified appeared to have some relevance to the subject matter of the dispute

Summary of this case from Loeb-Defever v. Strategic Constr., Ltd.
Case details for

Perritt v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:RICKY B. PERRITT, Individually; THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, a Texas Limited…

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 11, 2011

Citations

Case No. 4:11-CV-23 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 11, 2011)

Citing Cases

Loeb-Defever v. Strategic Constr., Ltd.

Indeed, the Court is satisfied that the witnesses identified by the Defendants are critical to determining…