From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perlus v. Spiess

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1899
29 Misc. 761 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)

Opinion

October, 1899.

House, Grossman Vorhaus, for appellants.

Leopold W. Harburger, for respondent.


The record failing to show that the defendants reside within the jurisdiction of the Municipal Court, the judgment must be reversed. Tyroler v. Gummersbach, 28 Misc. 151.

Present: FREEDMAN, P.J.; MacLEAN and LEVENTRITT, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide event.


Summaries of

Perlus v. Spiess

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Oct 1, 1899
29 Misc. 761 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)
Case details for

Perlus v. Spiess

Case Details

Full title:AARON PERLUS, Respondent, v . BRUNO B. SPIESS, Sued as JACOB SPIESS, and…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1899

Citations

29 Misc. 761 (N.Y. App. Term 1899)