From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 15, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-322 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-322

04-15-2015

CARL PERKINS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Madison Correctional Institution, Respondent.



Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Docs. #8), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition be DISMISSED with prejudice. Petitioner is DENIED any requested certificate of appealability and the Court hereby certifies to the United States Court of Appeals that an appeal would be objectively frivolous and therefore should not be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. April 15, 2015.

/s/_________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Perkins v. Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Apr 15, 2015
Case No. 3:14-cv-322 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2015)
Case details for

Perkins v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:CARL PERKINS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Madison Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Apr 15, 2015

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-322 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 15, 2015)