From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Carlson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 20, 2024
2:23-cv-02283-KK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-02283-KK-MAAx

06-20-2024

ROBERT PERKINS, an individual,, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT CARLSON, an individual; WILLIAM BETTENCOURT, an individual; DAVID TANNER, an individual; and ARBOR SNOWBOARDS, INC., a California corporation, Defendants. ROBERT CARLSON, an individual; WILLIAM BETTENCOURT, an individual; DAVID TANNER, an individual; and ARBOR SNOWBOARDS, INC., a California corporation,, Counter-Claimants, v. ROBERT PERKINS, an individual; ALAN KIRK, an individual; and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC, a Washington limited liability company, Counter-Defendants.

Donald J. Kula Javier F. Garcia PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant ROBERT PERKINS; Counter-Defendants ALAN KIRK and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC


Donald J. Kula Javier F. Garcia PERKINS COIE LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant ROBERT PERKINS; Counter-Defendants ALAN KIRK and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC

ORDER GRANTING THE REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Honorable Kenly Kiya Kato United States District Judge

ORDER

Having considered the Request for Dismissal With Prejudice and Order filed by ROBERT PERKINS (“Plaintiff”) and Counter-Defendants ALAN KIRK and NORTHSTAR DESIGN GROUP, LLC (together, the “Counter-Defendants”) and Defendants and Counter-Claimants, Robert Carlson, William Bettencourt, David Tanner and Arbor Snowboards, Inc. (“Counter-Claimants”) (collectively, the “Parties”), the Parties' Request for Dismissal With Prejudice is GRANTED.

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and the Request of Plaintiff and the Counter-Claimants, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Complaint action and all claims and defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice;
2. The Counter-Claims and all Counter-Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice;
3. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the action for the sole purpose of enforcing the terms of the Agreement, which enforcement may be sought by any party to the Agreement by filing a Noticed Motion pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perkins v. Carlson

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 20, 2024
2:23-cv-02283-KK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Perkins v. Carlson

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT PERKINS, an individual,, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT CARLSON, an…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 20, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-02283-KK-MAAx (C.D. Cal. Jun. 20, 2024)