From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkild v. Salazar

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jun 6, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00192-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2019)

Opinion

NUMBER 13-19-00192-CV

06-06-2019

MAGDALENA RUIZ PERKILD, Appellant, v. ERIKA SALAZAR, Appellee.


On appeal from the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2019-DCL-01858-E. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. The certificate of conference reflects that appellee does not oppose the motion.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant's motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. There being no agreement in the motion regarding costs, pursuant to Rule 42.1(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all costs are taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2019.


Summaries of

Perkild v. Salazar

COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
Jun 6, 2019
NUMBER 13-19-00192-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Perkild v. Salazar

Case Details

Full title:MAGDALENA RUIZ PERKILD, Appellant, v. ERIKA SALAZAR, Appellee.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

Date published: Jun 6, 2019

Citations

NUMBER 13-19-00192-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 6, 2019)