From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2023
1:23-cv-01318-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)

Opinion

1:23-cv-01318-ADA-CDB

10-10-2023

KIMBERLY PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT NIYOKO BROCK AND TO REMAND ACTION TO KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

ECF NO. 5

On September 5, 2023, Defendant Target Corporation removed this action from Kern County Superior Court. ECF No. 1. After meeting and conferring, Plaintiff and Defendant Target filed a joint stipulation on October 5, 2023. ECF No. 5. In that stipulation, Plaintiff and Defendant Target agree that Defendant Niyoko Brock should be dismissed from this action and that the action should be remanded to state court. ECF No. 5 at 2. Defendant Brock has not filed an answer in either state or federal court, and dismissal is therefore proper pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

Accordingly, 1. Defendant Niyoko Brock is dismissed from this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

2. This matter is remanded to the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Kern;

3. All deadlines, dates, and events in this action are vacated;

4. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs with respect to the removal and subsequent remand of this action; and

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perez v. Target Corp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 10, 2023
1:23-cv-01318-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Perez v. Target Corp.

Case Details

Full title:KIMBERLY PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 10, 2023

Citations

1:23-cv-01318-ADA-CDB (E.D. Cal. Oct. 10, 2023)