From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 2000
750 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-1256.

Opinion filed February 9, 2000.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Jr., Judge; L.T. No. 98-22925.

Steven E. Amster, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Steven R. Berger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, and LEVY, JJ.


Affirmed. See Williams v. State, 143 So.2d 484, 488 (Fla. 1962) (trial judge may ask neutral questions to clarify issues);Cooper v. State, 712 So.2d 1216, 1217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (prosecutorial comments which are not inflammatory or egregious do not necessitate a new trial).


Summaries of

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 9, 2000
750 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Perez v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALEXIS PEREZ, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 9, 2000

Citations

750 So. 2d 161 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Kidd v. State

The comments were not so egregious as to merit a new trial and we find no abuse of discretion in denying Kidd…