From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Siskel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 1985
107 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

January 22, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Morrison, J.).


Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Plaintiff's primary contention at trial was that defendant's decedent removed an excessive amount of cartilage from her nose when he performed a submucous resection. Given the sharp conflict between the respective experts called by plaintiff and defendant concerning, inter alia, whether the pathology report indicated that a normal or an egregiously abnormal amount of cartilage had been removed, and whether infection could have remained in plaintiff's nose after the operation, it cannot be said that "`the evidence preponderated so greatly in plaintiff's favor that the jury could not have reached its conclusion on any fair interpretation of the evidence'" ( Tannenbaum v. Mandell, 51 A.D.2d 593; see Siegel, N Y Prac, § 406). Lazer, J.P., Bracken, Rubin and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez v. Siskel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 1985
107 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Perez v. Siskel

Case Details

Full title:MARTHA PEREZ, Appellant, v. JACK SISKEL, as Executor of PAUL J. SCHOFIELD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 22, 1985

Citations

107 A.D.2d 742 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Defreese v. Defreese

Initially, we discern no error in Supreme Court submitting the issue of serious injury to the jury. It is…