From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Ransome

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 2024
1:22-cv-01087 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 18, 2024)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01087

01-18-2024

FRANCISCO PEREZ, Plaintiff v. SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN RANSOME, et al., Defendants


ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, on this 18th day of January 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Taylor Mack (“Defendant Mack”)'s motion to dismiss the complaint, filed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. No. 16) and Plaintiff Francisco Perez (“Plaintiff”)'s motion seeking the appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 26), IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant Mack's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED, and Defendant Mack is TERMINATED as a Defendant from the caption of this case;
2. This action SHALL PROCEED against Defendant Dr. Scott Prince (“Prince”) and Defendant Nurse Jane Doe 2; and
3. Plaintiff's motion seeking the appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 26) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDCE.

The Court notes that, with respect to Defendant Prince, there is a close of fact discovery deadline of February 1, 2024, and a dispositive motions deadline of April 1, 2024. (Doc. No. 25.)


Summaries of

Perez v. Ransome

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Jan 18, 2024
1:22-cv-01087 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Perez v. Ransome

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO PEREZ, Plaintiff v. SUPERINTENDENT KEVIN RANSOME, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 18, 2024

Citations

1:22-cv-01087 (M.D. Pa. Jan. 18, 2024)