From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 5, 2022
CV 21-3099-CJC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-3099-CJC (AGR)

07-05-2022

AGUSTIN PEREZ, Petitioner, v. WARREN MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CORMAC J. CARNEY United States District Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and the Report and Recommendation. No objections to the Report have been filed. Petitioner has filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Unexhausted Claim. (Dkt. No. 25.)

IT IS ORDERED that (1) the findings and recommendation of the Report are accepted; (2) Respondent's motion to dismiss the Petition is GRANTED IN PART only to the extent that the Sixth Amendment unanimity subclaim of Ground Five is deemed unexhausted; (3) Respondent shall respond to the Petition within 60 days after entry of this Order; and (4) the matter is referred back to the magistrate judge


Summaries of

Perez v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 5, 2022
CV 21-3099-CJC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Perez v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:AGUSTIN PEREZ, Petitioner, v. WARREN MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 5, 2022

Citations

CV 21-3099-CJC (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Jul. 5, 2022)