From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 6, 2017
Case No. 3:17-cv-00538-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-00538-HDM-VPC

12-06-2017

NOE ORTEGA PEREZ, Petitioner, v. BAKER, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

Petitioner Noe Ortega Perez has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and has now paid the filing fee (see ECF No. 4). The court has reviewed the petition pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, and it shall be docketed and served on respondents.

A petition for federal habeas corpus should include all claims for relief of which petitioner is aware. If petitioner fails to include such a claim in his petition, he may be forever barred from seeking federal habeas relief upon that claim. See 28 U.S.C. §2254(b) (successive petitions). If petitioner is aware of any claim not included in his petition, he should notify the court of that as soon as possible, perhaps by means of a motion to amend his petition to add the claim.

Petitioner has also submitted a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2). There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999 F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir.1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987); Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984). However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner is a person of such limited education as to be incapable of fairly presenting her claims. See Chaney, 801 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir.1970). Here, it appears that the legal issues that Perez wishes to raise may be complex. Therefore, his motion for counsel shall be granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk shall file and electronically SERVE the petition (ECF No. 1-1) on the respondents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General, as counsel for respondents.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall detach and file petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada (FPD) is appointed to represent petitioner.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus. The FPD shall have thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the court its inability to represent petitioner in these proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that after counsel has appeared for petitioner in this case, the court will issue a scheduling order, which will, among other things, set a deadline for the filing of an amended petition.

DATED: December 6, 2017.

/s/_________

HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Perez v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dec 6, 2017
Case No. 3:17-cv-00538-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2017)
Case details for

Perez v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:NOE ORTEGA PEREZ, Petitioner, v. BAKER, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 6, 2017

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-00538-HDM-VPC (D. Nev. Dec. 6, 2017)