From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2015
126 A.D.3d 1387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

292 TP 14-01720

03-20-2015

In the Matter of Lawrence PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

 Karen Murtagh, Executive Director, Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Buffalo (David W. Bentivegna of Counsel), for Petitioner. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of Counsel), for Respondent.


Karen Murtagh, Executive Director, Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Buffalo (David W. Bentivegna of Counsel), for Petitioner.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen Demuth of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, and DeJOSEPH, JJ.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks review of a tier III hearing determination finding him guilty of violating inmate rule 105.14 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][6][v] [unauthorized organizations] ). We agree with petitioner that the determination is not supported by substantial evidence (see generally People ex rel. Vega v. Smith, 66 N.Y.2d 130, 139, 495 N.Y.S.2d 332, 485 N.E.2d 997 ). The evidence at the disciplinary hearing established that petitioner had possession of printed material related to an unauthorized organization, but there was no evidence that the “material advocates either expressly or by clear implication, violence based upon race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, creed, law enforcement status or violence or acts of disobedience against department employees or that could facilitate organizational activity within the institution” (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][6][v]; see Matter of Kimbrough v. Fischer, 96 A.D.3d 1251, 1252, 946 N.Y.S.2d 714 ).

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously aned on the law without costs, the petition is granted, the penalty is vacated, and respondent is directed to expunge from petitioner's institutional record all references to the violation of inmate rule 105.14 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B][6][v] ).


Summaries of

Perez v. Annucci

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 20, 2015
126 A.D.3d 1387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Perez v. Annucci

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Lawrence PEREZ, Petitioner, v. Anthony ANNUCCI, Acting…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 20, 2015

Citations

126 A.D.3d 1387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
4 N.Y.S.3d 457
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 2327

Citing Cases

Bottom v. State

McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 556–558, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 ). In ruling that the proffered testimony of…

Bottom v. State

Those due process safeguards include the right to call witnesses at a disciplinary hearing unless the…