From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peretz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 27, 1998
710 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

reversing and remanding for a new hearing where transcript of involuntary commitment hearing could not be produced due to technological failure of the recording equipment and the record could not be reconstructed

Summary of this case from City of Miami v. Hervis

Opinion

No. 97-2697

Opinion filed May 27, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; John D. Wessel, Judge; L.T. Case No. MH 97-5881 Y.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Margaret Good-Earnest, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Charles M. Fahlbusch, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


Reversed. Because a transcript of this involuntary commitment hearing cannot be produced due to technological failings of the recording equipment at the hearing, and neither the trial court nor the attorneys are able to reconstruct the record of proceedings, a new hearing must be conducted. See Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 1977). The state has conceded that a remand is appropriate for that purpose.

GUNTHER, WARNER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Peretz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 27, 1998
710 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

reversing and remanding for a new hearing where transcript of involuntary commitment hearing could not be produced due to technological failure of the recording equipment and the record could not be reconstructed

Summary of this case from City of Miami v. Hervis
Case details for

Peretz v. State

Case Details

Full title:LORRAINE PERETZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 27, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 754 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

City of Miami v. Hervis

) cannot be provided, a new evidentiary hearing is required. See Gordon v. Gordon, 944 So.2d 527, 527 (Fla.…