From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perera v. Kennedy

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 16, 2021
318 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-1011

06-16-2021

Chinta M. PERERA, Appellant, v. David P. KENNEDY, et al., Appellees.

Lanny Russell, Brandon A. Cook, and Joseph W. Rogan of Smith Hulsey & Busey, Jacksonville, for Appellant. Michael Cavendish of Cavendish Partners, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.


Lanny Russell, Brandon A. Cook, and Joseph W. Rogan of Smith Hulsey & Busey, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Michael Cavendish of Cavendish Partners, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellees.

Per Curiam. The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) ; Jensen v. Whetstine , 985 So. 2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) ("An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.").

Makar, M.K. Thomas, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perera v. Kennedy

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Jun 16, 2021
318 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Perera v. Kennedy

Case Details

Full title:CHINTA M. PERERA, Appellant, v. DAVID P. KENNEDY, et al., Appellees.

Court:FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Jun 16, 2021

Citations

318 So. 3d 1285 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)