From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Percy v. Multnomah Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 12, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-01216-YY (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:17-cv-01216-YY

01-12-2018

ALBERT E. PERCY and CARL EVANS, Plaintiffs, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY OREGON, DEBORAY KAFOURY, JANE DOE, and JOHN DOE, Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge You issued a Findings and Recommendation [6] on November 29, 2017, in which she recommends that the Court dismiss this case without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) for failure to serve Defendants. This matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge You's Findings and Recommendation [6]. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 12 day of January, 2018.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Percy v. Multnomah Cnty.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 12, 2018
No. 3:17-cv-01216-YY (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Percy v. Multnomah Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT E. PERCY and CARL EVANS, Plaintiffs, v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY OREGON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 12, 2018

Citations

No. 3:17-cv-01216-YY (D. Or. Jan. 12, 2018)