From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perceval v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 834 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)

Opinion

June, 1901.

H.A. Robinson (G. Glenn Worden, of counsel), for appellant.

Spencer, Stickney Ordway, for respondent.


There is nothing in this case save a conflict of evidence, the preponderance being with the plaintiff.

Present: SCOTT, P.J., BEACH and FITZGERALD, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Perceval v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1901
35 Misc. 834 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)
Case details for

Perceval v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES PERCEVAL, Respondent, v . THE METROPOLITAN STREET RAILWAY COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1901

Citations

35 Misc. 834 (N.Y. App. Term 1901)