From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peralta v. Saggio Restaurant Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 14, 2021
21-CV-606 (RA) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-606 (RA) (BCM)

06-14-2021

NEPTALI PERALTA, et al., Plaintiff, v. SAGGIO RESTAURANT INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER SCHEDULING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

BARBARA MOSES, United States Magistrate Judge.

A settlement conference is scheduled before Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses on July 13, 2021, at 2:15 p.m., in Courtroom 20A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. This is an in-person proceeding. Counsel and parties are advised to consult the Chief Judge's current entry protocols, available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus, in advance of the conference.

THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO READ THIS ENTIRE ORDER CAREFULLY. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH PRE-CONFERENCE RESPONSIBILITIES MAY RESULT IN SANCTIONS.

1. Attendance of Parties, Trial Counsel, and Carriers Required. Each party must attend the settlement conference in person, accompanied by that party's lead trial attorney . Counsel must be fully knowledgeable concerning the facts of the case, relevant law, and the progress of the case to date, including settlement discussions.

a. If a party is a corporation, union, or other non-natural person, it must send a decision-maker with knowledge of the case and responsibility for determining the amount of any ultimate settlement; that is, a person who decides what settlement authority to give to counsel, not a person who has received, or must seek, authority from someone else within the organization.
b. If a party or party representative does not speak English, counsel must arrange for an interpreter to attend the conference and provide simultaneous translation. If an attorney serves as an interpreter, the Court will expect that attorney to (a) take the interpreter oath, and (b) bill time at interpreter rates. The interpreter must be present for the entire conference.
c. If liability insurance is involved, each relevant carrier must send a decision-maker with knowledge of the case and responsibility for determining the amount of the ultimate settlement (or the carrier's portion thereof).
d. If a party fails to attend the settlement conference with all of the required persons, that party may be required to reimburse the other parties for their time and travel expenses or face other sanctions.

2. Pre-Conference Settlement Discussion Required. The purpose of a Court-facilitated settlement conference is to settle the case - not simply to begin a settlement dialogue. The Court normally holds only one settlement conference per case. The Court therefore requires that, promptly after receipt of this Order, the parties conduct at least one good-faith settlement discussion, in person or by telephone, and that each party convey to each opposing party at least one good-faith settlement demand or offer, in advance of the deadline, set forth below, for submitting confidential settlement letters.

Past settlement negotiations may not be relied upon to satisfy this requirement

. Counsel should continue such discussions among themselves prior to the conference so as to clarify issues, narrow disputes, and otherwise make the conference as efficient and meaningful as possible.

3. Assertion of Inability to Pay. In the event defendants' settlement position is based on their asserted inability to pay what might otherwise be considered a reasonable settlement amount, the Court further requires that defendants produce to plaintiffs' counsel , in advance of the deadline for submitting confidential settlement letters, documents sufficient to evidence their financial status . Unless the parties agree otherwise, the documents to be produced shall include, for all relevant years, defendants' financial statements (audited if such statements exist), federal and state income tax returns, bank statements, securities account statements, loan agreements and statements, documents evidencing the purchase, financing or sale of any real property, and documents evidencing any other debts, judgments, or liens relied on by any defendant asserting an inability to pay. Absent further order of the Court or the express agreement of the parties, these documents may not be further disseminated by plaintiffs' counsel and may not be used for any purpose other than good-faith settlement negotiations in this action. The documents may be suitably labeled on production (for example, "CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT PRODUCED FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY PER FED. R. EVID. 408"). In no event may a defendant assert an inability to pay at the settlement conference without having provided plaintiffs' counsel with the documents relevant to that assertion .

4. Confidential Settlement Letter. No. later than one week (seven calendar days) before the conference, each party shall submit a confidential settlement letter to chambers by email, addressed to MosesNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov, marked "Confidential Material for Use Only at Settlement Conference." Do not file the confidential settlement letter on ECF. Do not send copies to adverse parties unless all parties have agreed to exchange their letters. Settlement letters are limited to six pages, not including any exhibits, which are permitted but should be kept to a minimum. Each letter should contain:

a. A summary of the relevant facts and law, focusing on the issues most pertinent to settlement. For example, if liability depends on an uncertain legal issue, the
parties' letters should identify that issue and any key case law or statutes. Conversely, if liability is not seriously contested, the letters should focus on damages or other remedies.
b. A candid assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of the case, including affirmative defenses, together with counsel's realistic assessment of its settlement value or range. If there are any extra-legal impediments to settlement, note them here.
c. A brief description of settlement negotiations to date, including the date and time of the parties' last good-faith settlement discussion and the terms of each party's most recent demand or offer.
d. Any other information likely to be helpful to the settlement process.

5. Acknowledgment Form. On the same date that the confidential settlement letters are due, each party shall submit the attached Acknowledgment Form to chambers by email, and serve it on all other parties , identifying the individuals who will attend the settlement conference. Do not file the Acknowledgment Form on ECF .

6. Conduct of the Conference. All proceedings at the settlement conference will be confidential. Discussions are "off the record," and may not be used in discovery or at trial. The Court will function as a mediator. Efficient use of this process requires that parties and counsel be prepared for the conference and candid with the Court. At the outset of the conference each party may make a brief presentation in the presence of all parties and counsel. Since the purpose of the conference is to facilitate settlement - not to try the case - presenters are requested to address their remarks directly to the opposing party and to focus on the issues most relevant to settlement. Following the initial joint session, the Court will work separately with each side in private. During these sessions the Court may address questions directly to the parties (in the presence of their counsel) and will expect candid responses. In addition, all parties should be prepared to disclose their legal fees and costs to date and their estimates of fees and costs through judgment. Additional joint sessions may be convened if likely to advance the goal of settlement.

7. Requests to Reschedule the Conference or Modify these Procedures. Requests to reschedule the settlement conference, or to modify the page limits, attendance requirements, or other provisions of this Order, must be made by letter-motion, filed via ECF in accordance with the Individual Practices of Judge Moses, as soon as the need for the adjournment or modification arises and in any event at least one week (seven calendar days) before the scheduled conference. Requests for adjournment must include two proposed dates, acceptable to all parties and counsel, for the rescheduled conference. Before proposing dates, counsel are advised to call chambers to determine the Court's availability. Requests to modify the attendance requirements will be granted only on a showing of significant hardship. If the parties settle the case prior to the scheduled conference, they must promptly so inform the Court by letter, filed via ECF, stating whether the settlement requires Court approval and, if not, how much time the parties require to submit a stipulation of dismissal to the district judge.

8. No Effect on Other Deadlines. Neither the scheduling of a settlement conference nor any adjournment affects the parties' other litigation deadlines or obligations.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peralta v. Saggio Restaurant Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 14, 2021
21-CV-606 (RA) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2021)
Case details for

Peralta v. Saggio Restaurant Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NEPTALI PERALTA, et al., Plaintiff, v. SAGGIO RESTAURANT INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 14, 2021

Citations

21-CV-606 (RA) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 14, 2021)