From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peralta v. All Weather Tire Sales Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2009
58 A.D.3d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-02891.

January 27, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Danilo Mendez and the third-party defendant Rosemary Peralta appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated January 31, 2008, which denied their motion for leave to reargue their opposition to that branch of the plaintiff's' motion which was to enforce a written settlement agreement dated June 7, 2004, which had been determined in an order of the same court dated August 31, 2007.

Picciano Scahill, P.C., Westbury, N.Y. (Gilbert J. Hardy and Francis J. Scahill of counsel), for appellants.

Argyropoulos Bender, Astoria, N.Y. (Michael S. Bender of counsel), for respondents.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, RUTH C. BALKIN, RANDALL T. ENG, JJ.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Florio, Balkin and Eng, JJ.


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see Vandewinckel v Northport/East Northport Union Free School Dist., 24 AD3d 432, 433; High v County of Westchester, 238 AD2d 476; Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 568).


Summaries of

Peralta v. All Weather Tire Sales Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2009
58 A.D.3d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Peralta v. All Weather Tire Sales Serv

Case Details

Full title:GUSTAVO PERALTA et al., Respondents, v. ALL WEATHER TIRE SALES SERVICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2009

Citations

58 A.D.3d 823 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 519
870 N.Y.S.2d 923

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank v. Russell-Esposito

The Supreme Court properly treated the defendant's motion as one for leave to reargue, since the mortgagor…

Ex'r of N.Y. Estate of Kates v. Pressly

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, with costs. The appeal must be dismissed, as no appeal lies from an…