From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peral v. Brittgab Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2021
21-CV-1892 (RA) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-1892 (RA) (BCM)

08-25-2021

RAFAEL PERAL, Plaintiff, v. BRITTGAB CORP., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

BARBARA MOSES, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

On July 13, 2021, plaintiff Rafael Peral and his counsel C.K. Lee moved for sanctions against defendant Gabriel Weiser and defendants' counsel Ilan Weiser for their out-of-court conduct during an unsuccessful mediation held earlier that day. (Dkt. No. 45.) On July 20, 2021, the Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing on the sanctions motion and directed plaintiff Peral, attorney Lee, defendant Weiser, and attorney Weiser to appear and testify. (Dkt. No. 58.) The Court further directed plaintiff's counsel to "arrange for the personal attendance of a simultaneous Spanish translator" for Mr. Peral. (Id. ¶ 4.) On August 4, at plaintiff's request, the Court rescheduled the hearing for August 24, 2021, at 12:00 noon. (Dkt. No. 67.)

On August 24, 2021, defendant Weiser and attorney Weiser appeared for the evidentiary hearing, accompanied by attorney Weiser's law partner Paul Rooney (whose presence was required because attorney Weiser was to be a witness at the hearing). Attorney Lee also appeared, with his law partner Anne Seelig, but without Mr. Peral or a translator, and advised the Court that plaintiff wished to withdraw the sanctions motion. No prior notice of the withdrawal having been given, defendants moved orally for an award of their reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in preparing for the aborted sanctions hearing. Plaintiff voiced no opposition.

On this record - and for the reasons discussed in more detail during yesterday's proceedings - plaintiffs motion for sanctions is DENIED and defendants' motion for attorneys' fees and costs is GRANTED pursuant to the 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(f)(1)(C).

Defendants' fee application is due August 31, 2021. Opposition papers are due September 15, 2021. Reply papers are due September 30, 2021. If the parties are able to resolve their remaining fee issues by stipulation, they shall promptly so advise the Court in writing.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Peral v. Brittgab Corp.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Aug 25, 2021
21-CV-1892 (RA) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021)
Case details for

Peral v. Brittgab Corp.

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL PERAL, Plaintiff, v. BRITTGAB CORP., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Aug 25, 2021

Citations

21-CV-1892 (RA) (BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 25, 2021)