PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 6, 1988

92 Or. App. 99 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)

92 Or. App. 99

Opinion

756 P.2d 1287 (Or.App. 1988) 92 Or.App. 99 In the Matter of the Compensation of Raleigh H. Brannon, Claimant. Raleigh H. BRANNON, Petitioner, v. MULTNOMAH PLYWOOD CORP., and Liberty Northwest Insurance, Respondents. WCB 86-02639; CA A45280. Court of Appeals of Oregon. July 6, 1988

       Argued and Submitted June 10, 1988.

       Robert Wollheim, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Welch, Bruuns&sGreen, Portland.

       Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Schwabe, Williamsons&sWyatt, Portland.

       Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and GRABER, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Remanded for reconsideration. Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200, 205, 752 P.2d 312 (1988); Johnston v. James River Corp., 91 Or.App. 721, 756 P.2d 696 (1988).