PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 23, 1979

39 Or. App. 609 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

39 Or. App. 609

Opinion

593 P.2d 1283 (Or.App. 1979) 39 Or.App. 609 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Kirk Huntley FRANCIS, Appellant. No. 78-0404; CA 11820. Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 23, 1979

       Argued and Submitted March 19, 1979.

       Ellen F. Rosenblum, Eugene, argued the cause, for appellant. With her on brief was Hammonss&sJensen, Eugene.

       William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen. and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Before SCHWAB, C. J., and TANZER, RICHARDSON and ROBERTS, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. United States v. Edwards, 443 F.Supp. 192 (D.Mass.1977); United States v. Gumerlock, 590 F.2d 794 (9th Cir. 1979).