PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 30, 1979

39 Or. App. 882 (Or. Ct. App. 1979)

39 Or. App. 882

593 P.2d 531

593 P.2d 798

Opinion

593 P.2d 1301 (Or.App. 1979) 39 Or.App. 882 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Fredrick Graham DOYLE, Appellant. No. 104926; CA 11182. Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 30, 1979

       Argued and Submitted Oct. 19, 1978.

       Stephanie A. Smyth, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.        Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., and Gregory A. Parker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

       Before SCHWAB, C. J., and THORNTON, TANZER and BUTTLER, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Reversed and remanded. See State v. Reichert, 39 Or.App. 905, 593 P.2d 1298 (decided this date).