PER CURIAM OPINION

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINION

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 18, 1987

88 Or. App. 472 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

88 Or. App. 472

Opinion

745 P.2d 441 (Or.App. 1987) 88 Or.App. 472 In the Matter of the Compensation of Victoria Vance-Nelson, Claimant. Victoria VANCE-NELSON, Petitioner, v. OWENS ILLINOIS and May Department Stores, Respondents. WCB 85-05286s&s84-13005; CA A41267. Court of Appeals of Oregon. November 18, 1987

       Argued and Submitted June 10, 1987.

       Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Nelson R. Hall and Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Learys&s Conboy, Portland.

       Cecilia Lee, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Owens Illinois. With her on the brief were William H. Replogle, Ridgway K. Foley, P.C., and Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moores&sRoberts, Portland.

       Craig A. Staples, Portland, argued the cause for respondent May Department Stores. With him on the brief was Roberts, Reinischs&sKlor, P.C., Portland.

       Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. Farmers Ins. Group v. SAIF, 301 Or. 612, 724 P.2d 799 (1986); International Paper Co. v. Wright, 80 Or.App. 444, 722 P.2d 57 (1986).