From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peopple v. Pinnock

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2016
29 N.Y.S.3d 849 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

No. 570107/14.

02-05-2016

The PEOpPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brandon PINNOCK, Defendant–Appellant.


Judgment of conviction (Lisa A. Sokoloff, J. at plea; Laurie Peterson, J., at sentencing), rendered December 17, 2013, affirmed.

We are unpersuaded that the probationary sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe, and find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Fair, 33 AD3d 558, 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007] ). Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain, and should not now “be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for” (id. at 558, quoting People v. Chambers, 123 A.D.2d 270, 270 [1986] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

Peopple v. Pinnock

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
Feb 5, 2016
29 N.Y.S.3d 849 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

Peopple v. Pinnock

Case Details

Full title:The PEOpPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Brandon PINNOCK…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 5, 2016

Citations

29 N.Y.S.3d 849 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)