From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zink

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 10, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1656 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-10-2016

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher ZINK, also known as Christopher G. Zink, Defendant–Appellant.

Napier & Napier, Rochester (James A. Napier of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Stephen X. O'Brien of Counsel), for Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (James J. Piampiano, J.), rendered February 28, 2013. The judgment revoked defendant's sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Napier & Napier, Rochester (James A. Napier of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Stephen X. O'Brien of Counsel), for Respondent.

Opinion

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, and SCUDDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zink

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 10, 2016
140 A.D.3d 1656 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Zink

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Christopher ZINK, also…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 10, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 1656 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 4555
31 N.Y.S.3d 919