From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Zamot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 1992
179 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

January 13, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McInerney, J.).


Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant's assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738; People v. Paige, 54 A.D.2d 631; cf., People v. Gonzalez, 47 N.Y.2d 606). Bracken, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber, Balletta and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Zamot

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 13, 1992
179 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Zamot

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS ZAMOT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 13, 1992

Citations

179 A.D.2d 713 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
578 N.Y.S.2d 613

Citing Cases

Dalton v. United States

E.g., Mosch v. Hansen, 744 N.Y.S.2d 222, 224 (App. Div. 2002) (internal quotation marks and citations…

Francois v. Happes

Although not cited by the defendant, she is relying on VTL § 1180 (e) which provides that "[t]he driver of…