From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 7, 1992

Appeal from the Steuben County Court, Scudder, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant waived any defects that may have existed in the pre-sentence investigation report when he failed to raise an objection to its contents at the time of sentencing (see, People v Walworth, 167 A.D.2d 622, 623). Moreover, defendant has made no showing that County Court relied on any prejudicial information in imposing sentence (see, People v Redman, 148 A.D.2d 966, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 745). Defendant's sentence, the result of a negotiated plea bargain, is not harsh or excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 7, 1992
186 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Young

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALLEN YOUNG, III…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 7, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 1072 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
588 N.Y.S.2d 687

Citing Cases

People v. Swartz

In any event, to the extent that his argument is premised on his counsel's alleged deficiencies in the…

People v. Smith

In any event, that contention is without merit. An order of protection may properly be issued independent of…