From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Young

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN
Apr 11, 2012
B232353 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2012)

Opinion

B232353

04-11-2012

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY MICHAEL YOUNG, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS


California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA085683)


ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING


CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on March 21, 2012, be modified as follows:

1. On page 1, line 2 after the caption, the sentence "Affirmed as modified" is changed to "Affirmed."

2. On page 2, the last sentence of the first paragraph, the words "modify the conduct credits, but in all other respects," is deleted so the sentence now reads:

We affirm the judgment.

3. On page 8, last line, delete the sentence "We agree that he is entitled to additional conduct credits." The following sentence is inserted in its place:

We disagree.

4. On page 9, the third full paragraph, beginning "Section 4109 is amended" is deleted and the following paragraph is inserted in its place:

As an exception to the foregoing provisions, however, subdivisions (b)(2) and (c)(2) of Penal Code section 4019 at that time provided six days of credit for four days actually served, "[i]f the prisoner is required to register as a sex offender pursuant to Chapter 5.5 (commencing with Section 290), was committed for a serious felony, as defined in Section 1192.7, or has a prior conviction for a serious felony, as defined in Section 1192.7, or a violent felony, as defined in Section 667.5." Because defendant personally used a deadly and dangerous weapon in the commission of his crime, his was a serious felony. (Id., § 1192.7, subd. (c)(23).) He thus was entitled only to the six days of credit for every four actually in presentence custody which he received.

5. On page 10, the paragraph after the Disposition heading is deleted and the following is inserted in its place:

The judgment is affirmed.

This modification changes the judgment. Respondent's petition for rehearing is denied

_________________

PERLUSS, P. J.

_________________

WOODS, J.

_________________

JACKSON, J.


Summaries of

People v. Young

COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN
Apr 11, 2012
B232353 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2012)
Case details for

People v. Young

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ANTHONY MICHAEL YOUNG, Defendant…

Court:COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN

Date published: Apr 11, 2012

Citations

B232353 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 11, 2012)