From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 2002
298 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1959

October 22, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dorothy Cropper, J.), rendered April 3, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

SUZANNE M. HERBERT, for respondent.

ERIC GOTTLIEB, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Andrias, Marlow, JJ.


The court properly denied defendant's challenge for cause, since the prospective juror's voir dire responses, viewed as a whole, did not cast any doubt on her ability to remain impartial (see People v. Arnold, 96 N.Y.2d 358). The panelist's use of terms such as "think" and "pretty sure" were not equivocal when taken in context (see People v. Chambers, 97 N.Y.2d 417, 419).

The court properly exercised its discretion in adjudicating defendant a persistent felony offender, given his serious and violent criminal history. We perceive no basis for a reduction of sentence.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 22, 2002
298 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Young

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. JERRY YOUNG…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 22, 2002

Citations

298 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
748 N.Y.S.2d 479

Citing Cases

People v. Rosa

try’ are ‘not ... talismanic words that automatically make a statement equivocal’ " ( People v. Shulman , 6…

People v. Rosa

], lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 864 [2001]; People v Butts, 140 A.D.2d 739, 740 [1988]), and prospective juror No. 288…