From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Yang

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Oct 24, 2023
No. C098083 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2023)

Opinion

C098083

10-24-2023

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN YANG, Defendant and Appellant.


NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

(Super. Ct. No. 14F04073)

MAURO, J.

Defendant John Yang appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for resentencing under Penal Code former section 1170.95 (now Penal Code section 1172.6). Appellate counsel filed a brief raising no arguable issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216 (Delgadillo) and asked that we exercise our discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.

Effective June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered Penal Code former section 1170.95 as section 1172.6 without substantive changes. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.)

In a letter dated June 26, 2023, appellate counsel wrote defendant, explaining he would be filing a Delgadillo brief and that defendant may file a supplemental brief or letter within 30 days of the filing of the Delgadillo brief. In a second letter, dated July 7, 2023, counsel further notified defendant that if defendant failed to file a supplemental brief, his appeal would likely be dismissed as abandoned. On July 10, 2023, this court sent a letter notifying defendant: (1) his counsel filed an appellate brief stating his review of the record did not identify any arguable issues; (2) as a case arising from an order denying postconviction relief, defendant was not constitutionally entitled to counsel or to an independent review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in Delgadillo, defendant had 30 days to file a supplemental brief or letter raising any argument he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant that if this court did not receive a letter or brief within that 30-day period, the court may dismiss his appeal as abandoned. More than 30 days elapsed and we received no communication from defendant.

We consider defendant's appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed. (Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)

DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

We concur: ROBIE, Acting P. J., KRAUSE, J.


Summaries of

People v. Yang

California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento
Oct 24, 2023
No. C098083 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2023)
Case details for

People v. Yang

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JOHN YANG, Defendant and…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

No. C098083 (Cal. Ct. App. Oct. 24, 2023)