From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Xocoxicchocojay

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2021
198 A.D.3d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2020–01044 Ind. No. 314/19

10-20-2021

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rudy A. XOCOXICCHOCOJAY, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, N.Y. (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., LINDA CHRISTOPHER, PAUL WOOTEN, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (William J. Condon, J.), imposed January 10, 2020, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

RIVERA, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Xocoxicchocojay

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Oct 20, 2021
198 A.D.3d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Xocoxicchocojay

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rudy A. XOCOXICCHOCOJAY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

198 A.D.3d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
152 N.Y.S.3d 830