From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Xocoxicchocojay

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 20, 2021
No. 2021-05739 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2021-05739 Ind. 314/19

10-20-2021

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Rudy A. Xocoxicchocojay, appellant.

Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant. Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.


Laurette D. Mulry, Riverhead, NY (Felice B. Milani of counsel), for appellant.

Timothy D. Sini, District Attorney, Riverhead, NY (Thomas C. Costello of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., LINDA CHRISTOPHER, PAUL WOOTEN, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County (William J. Condon, J.), imposed January 10, 2020, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WOOTEN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Xocoxicchocojay

Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department
Oct 20, 2021
No. 2021-05739 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)
Case details for

People v. Xocoxicchocojay

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Rudy A…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Oct 20, 2021

Citations

No. 2021-05739 (N.Y. App. Div. Oct. 20, 2021)