From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Worth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1990
162 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

June 28, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County, George Roberts, J.


Defendant's claim that the prosecutor breached the plea bargain by making a sentence recommendation was not preserved and, in any event, is without merit, since defendant did not fulfill his part of the bargain by making restitution of the $100,000 he had stolen. Nor was the sentence excessive. Larceny in the third degree being a class "D" felony with a maximum sentence of seven years, the sentence imposed was actually in the lower range of the court's discretion (see, People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305-306; People v. Junco, 43 A.D.2d 266, 268, affd 35 N.Y.2d 419, cert denied 421 U.S. 951).

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Milonas, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Worth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 28, 1990
162 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

People v. Worth

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIC WORTH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 28, 1990

Citations

162 A.D.2d 427 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 324

Citing Cases

People v. Cataldo

The defendant did not object to the prosecutor's remarks at sentencing, nor did he move to withdraw his plea…