From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wolff

Michigan Court of Appeals
Apr 30, 1970
23 Mich. App. 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

Summary

In Wolff, two confessions were obtained in violation of the statute, but both were found to be voluntary by the trial court.

Summary of this case from People v. Strunk

Opinion

Docket No. 5,521.

Decided April 30, 1970.

Appeal from Recorder's Court of Detroit, John A. Ricca and Joseph E. Maher, JJ. Submitted Division 1 March 2, 1970, at Detroit. (Docket No. 5,521.) Decided April 30, 1970.

Howard Wolff was convicted, on his plea of guilty, of first-degree murder. Defendant's motion for a new trial denied. Defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, William L. Cahalan, Prosecuting Attorney, Dominick R. Carnovale, Chief, Appellate Department, and Patricia J. Pernick, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

George W. Schudlich, for defendant on appeal.

Before: LESINSKI, C.J., and QUINN and V.J. BRENNAN, JJ.


On leave granted, defendant appeals his 1953 conviction and sentence for first-degree murder. The issue which controls the decision on this appeal is properly stated by the people as:

"Did the trial court commit reversible error in allowing statements of the appellant to be admitted in evidence?"

Our answer is yes, as to the confession of August 14, 1952.

August 12, 1952, Chester Czernal was shot and killed at his home. August 14, 1952, at about 1:30 p.m., defendant, then 16 years of age, was arrested and taken to police headquarters. After about four hours' questioning, defendant gave a formal confession to the chief assistant prosecuting attorney in the presence of a stenographer and two detectives. Defendant was alone.

Apparently defendant was then turned over to the juvenile authorities. August 17, 1952, at the juvenile detention home, defendant made another inculpatory statement to two officers in the presence of a codefendant. August 18, 1952, a warrant for defendant's arrest was obtained and August 22, 1952, defendant was taken into juvenile court, which waived jurisdiction.

August 25, 1952, defendant was arraigned in Recorder's Court, and his ten-day trial began in February, 1953. At trial, and over objection, defendant's confession of August 14, 1952, and his inculpatory statement of August 17, 1952, were admitted in evidence. At a Walker hearing held March 7, 1968, the trial court found that both confessions were voluntary and admissible. We do not disturb that finding.

People v. Walker (On Rehearing, 1965), 374 Mich. 331.

We reverse on the authority of People v. Roberts (1966), 3 Mich. App. 605. The failure to take this minor defendant before the juvenile court immediately, as required by CL 1948, § 764.27 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.886), was a violation of defendant's right to due process and vitiated the August 14 confession. The subsequent finding of voluntariness did not cure this defect.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Summaries of

People v. Wolff

Michigan Court of Appeals
Apr 30, 1970
23 Mich. App. 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)

In Wolff, two confessions were obtained in violation of the statute, but both were found to be voluntary by the trial court.

Summary of this case from People v. Strunk
Case details for

People v. Wolff

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. WOLFF

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 30, 1970

Citations

23 Mich. App. 550 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970)
179 N.W.2d 206

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Mich. App. 605; 143 N.W.2d 182 (1966). 23 Mich. App. 550, 552; 179 N.W.2d 206 (1970). We reverse on the…

People v. Strunk

One line of cases provides authority for a per se rule requiring strict application of the language of MCL…