From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Witbeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 27, 2002
299 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

12311

Decided and Entered: November 27, 2002.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Mathews, J.), rendered June 15, 2000, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.

Jay L. Wilber, Public Defender, Binghamton, for appellant.

Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Robin S. Engler of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Defendant entered a negotiated plea of guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced to a determinate sentence of two years and three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that the three-year postrelease supervision period was harsh and excessive. Where a sentence is within the permissible statutory range, it will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion by the sentencing court or the existence of extraordinary circumstances warranting a modification thereof (see People v. Morris, 275 A.D.2d 818, lv denied 96 N.Y.2d 737; People v. Journey, 260 A.D.2d 863). Although County Court imposed the maximum postrelease supervision period permitted by statute (see Penal Law § 70.45), our review of the record establishes no basis to disturb the sentence imposed.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Witbeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 27, 2002
299 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Witbeck

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BRUCE N. WITBECK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 27, 2002

Citations

299 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
749 N.Y.S.2d 747

Citing Cases

People v. Stearns

Finally, defendant's 12-year prison sentence was neither harsh nor excessive. Given the seriousness of his…

People v. Pailin

We disagree. A sentence that falls within the permissible statutory ranges will not be disturbed unless it…