From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wingate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 8, 1996
225 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

March 8, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Monroe County, Affronti, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced to consecutive indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 2 1/2 to 7 1/2 years on each count. The People concede that the sentence imposed by Supreme Court for the class D violent felony convictions (Penal Law § 70.02 [c]; § 130.65 [3]), exceeds the maximum permissible sentence of imprisonment of 2 1/3 to 7 years (Penal Law § 70.02 [b]; § 70.00 [2] [d]; [3] [b]). Because that sentence is illegal, it must be reduced to consecutive indeterminate terms of imprisonment of 2 1/3 to 7 years ( see, e.g., People v Lozado, 180 A.D.2d 410, 411).


Summaries of

People v. Wingate

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 8, 1996
225 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Wingate

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DANIEL WINGATE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 8, 1996

Citations

225 A.D.2d 1085 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
639 N.Y.S.2d 754

Citing Cases

People v. Rawlinson

The People concede that the sentence is illegal insofar as it imposes a term of incarceration of 3½ to 7…

People v. Ehrhardt

As the People correctly concede, the sentence is illegal insofar as it imposes a five-year period of…