From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

August 15, 1994

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.).


Ordered, that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the provision of the sentence requiring the defendant to make restitution in the sum of $60 to the Rockland County Narcotics Task Force; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The County Court properly exercised its discretion in allowing inquiry into the fact that the defendant had prior felony and misdemeanor convictions and into the sentences imposed for those convictions while preventing inquiry into the underlying facts or nature of those crimes (see, People v. Williams, 56 N.Y.2d 236, 238-239; People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371; People v. Winters, 194 A.D.2d 703; People v. Tirado, 192 A.D.2d 755).

Upon our review of the two audiotapes recorded on October 25, 1988 and November 11, 1988, we find that the County Court properly determined that they were sufficiently audible and intelligible to be admitted into evidence (see, People v. Ely, 68 N.Y.2d 520; People v. Lubow, 29 N.Y.2d 58, 68; People v. Morgan, 175 A.D.2d 930, 932; People v. Papa, 168 A.D.2d 692). Even though one tape contained static and the other was inaudible in parts, the transactions between the undercover officer and the defendant or his co-conspirator were audible and, as a result, these infirmities went to the weight of the evidence and not to its admissibility (see, People v. Harris, 199 A.D.2d 636; People v Peterson, 188 A.D.2d 1002; People v. Watson, 172 A.D.2d 882; compare, People v. Wilson, 182 A.D.2d 734). Since the tapes were audible and intelligible to third parties, the County Court properly exercised its discretion in allowing the jury to utilize transcripts prepared by the undercover officer while the tapes were played and properly instructed the jury that the transcripts were not evidence (see, People v. Lubow, 29 N.Y.2d, at 68, supra; People v. Watson, supra, at 883; People v. Papa, 168 A.D.2d, at 692, supra; People v. Robinson, 158 A.D.2d 628; People v Carrington, 151 A.D.2d 687; People v. Warner, 126 A.D.2d 788, 789).

Viewing the evidence, in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15). As the People correctly concede, however, at the time it imposed sentence, the County Court had no authority to require the defendant to make restitution of $60 to the Rockland County Narcotics Task Force (see, Penal Law § 60.27, [4] [b]; People v. Rowe, 75 N.Y.2d 948; People v. Walker, 182 A.D.2d 790; People v. Montalvo, 178 A.D.2d 560), and we have therefore modified the judgment accordingly. The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05) or without merit. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wilson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1994
207 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RONNIE WILSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 1994

Citations

207 A.D.2d 463 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
615 N.Y.S.2d 769

Citing Cases

People v. Sagado

The defendant's statements to the police were properly admitted into evidence since they were voluntarily…

People v. Redmond

The trial court properly admitted into evidence a tape recording of a telephone call between the defendant…