From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 19, 2021
199 A.D.3d 1447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

818 KA 18-01993

11-19-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony C. WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant.

AMDURSKY, PELKY, FENNELL & WALLEN, P.C., OSWEGO (COURTNEY S. RADICK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


AMDURSKY, PELKY, FENNELL & WALLEN, P.C., OSWEGO (COURTNEY S. RADICK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (AMY L. HALLENBECK OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, TROUTMAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, criminal sexual act in the first degree ( Penal Law § 130.50 [2] ). We affirm.

Weight of the evidence review "involves a ‘two-step approach’ wherein a [reviewing] court must (1) ‘determine whether, based on all the credible evidence, an acquittal would not have been unreasonable’; and[, if yes,] (2) ‘weigh the relative probative force of conflicting testimony and the relative strength of conflicting inferences that may be drawn from the testimony’ " ( People v. Sanchez , 32 N.Y.3d 1021, 1023, 87 N.Y.S.3d 135, 112 N.E.3d 312 [2018] ; see People v. Delamota , 18 N.Y.3d 107, 116-117, 936 N.Y.S.2d 614, 960 N.E.2d 383 [2011] ). We thus reject defendant's contention that a guilty verdict is automatically against the weight of the evidence whenever an acquittal would not have been unreasonable (see People v. Danielson , 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348-349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ; People v. Bleakley , 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 [1987] ). We also reject defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim (see People v. Tetro , 181 A.D.3d 1286, 1288, 119 N.Y.S.3d 788 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 1070, 129 N.Y.S.3d 388, 152 N.E.3d 1189 [2020] ; People v. Vincenty , 138 A.D.3d 428, 428-429, 28 N.Y.S.3d 686 [1st Dept. 2016], lv denied 27 N.Y.3d 1156, 39 N.Y.S.3d 390, 62 N.E.3d 130 [2016] ; People v. Martinez , 35 A.D.3d 156, 157, 825 N.Y.S.2d 200 [1st Dept. 2006], lv denied 8 N.Y.3d 924, 834 N.Y.S.2d 515, 866 N.E.2d 461 [2007] ). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 19, 2021
199 A.D.3d 1447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Anthony C. WILLIAMS…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 19, 2021

Citations

199 A.D.3d 1447 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
199 A.D.3d 1447

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Disposition: Applications for Criminal Leave to appeal denied Decision Reported Below: 4th Dept: 199 A.D.3d…