From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1995
221 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 27, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

A defendant's right to be present at trial may be forfeited where he deliberately absents himself from the trial (see, People v Sanchez, 65 N.Y.2d 436). The defendant failed to appear for jury deliberations, during which portions of the transcript were read to the jury. "Before proceeding in the defendant's absence, the court should have made inquiry and recited on the record the facts and reasons it relied upon in determining that defendant's absence was deliberate" (People v Brooks, 75 N.Y.2d 898, 899). The court's failure to conduct an inquiry into the defendant's absence on the record coupled with the court's reading back of portions of the transcript in the defendant's absence necessitate reversal ( see, People v Carroll, 196 A.D.2d 546).

We find no merit to the defendant's remaining contentions. Bracken, J.P., Sullivan, Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 27, 1995
221 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROY WILLIAMS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 27, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 674 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 158