Opinion
November 19, 1990
Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Orenstein, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Prior to the acceptance by the Trial Judge of his plea of guilty, the defendant, through counsel, waived "any decided or undecided motions, applications or hearings". By so withdrawing his pretrial motions, the defendant waived his right to appellate review of the Trial Judge's suppression determination and is precluded from now raising suppression issues on appeal (see, People v. Kafka, 128 A.D.2d 895; People v. Feingold, 125 A.D.2d 587; People v. Colarusso, 103 A.D.2d 848; see also, People v. Williams, 36 N.Y.2d 829, cert. denied 423 U.S. 873).
The defendant also contends that he was denied his right to counsel of his own choosing because the Trial Judge failed to grant a continuance to permit him to substitute retained counsel for his assigned counsel. Whether such a continuance should be granted is largely at the discretion of the Trial Judge, and depends upon the particular facts of the case (see, People v. Arroyave, 49 N.Y.2d 264, 271). The defendant's request was made on the eve of trial, and the defendant had had a reasonable opportunity to retain counsel of his own choosing during the approximately eight months between his indictment and the time of trial. Under the circumstances presented here, the Trial Judge did not improvidently exercise his discretion in denying the defendant's request (see, People v. Tineo, 64 N.Y.2d 531; People v. Arroyave, supra; People v. Dixon, 127 A.D.2d 785).
Moreover, we note that our review of the plea allocution indicates that the defendant pleaded guilty voluntarily and that the plea satisfied the requirements of People v. Harris ( 61 N.Y.2d 9).
We have reviewed the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Eiber, J.P., Harwood, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.