From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Willams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 18, 2017
146 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

01-18-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bobbie WILLAMS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Larry Stendig of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas Ross of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Larry Stendig of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas Ross of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), imposed February 14, 2013, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see

People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 265, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Rennick, 123 A.D.3d 1146, 997 N.Y.S.2d 637 ; People v. Reyes, 121 A.D.3d 820, 993 N.Y.S.2d 379 ; People v. Coleman, 116 A.D.3d 708, 982 N.Y.S.2d 784 ) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., HALL, COHEN, LaSALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Willams

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 18, 2017
146 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Willams

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Bobbie WILLAMS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 18, 2017

Citations

146 A.D.3d 905 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 328
44 N.Y.S.3d 775