Opinion
2014-06-5
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Chauncey WILKINS, Also Known as CP or Shanks, Appellant.
Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Michael K. Gould of counsel), for appellant. D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.
Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Michael K. Gould of counsel), for appellant. D. Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.
Before: STEIN, J.P., McCARTHY, ROSE and EGAN JR., JJ.
EGAN JR., J.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Williams, J.), rendered October 3, 2012, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and thereafter was sentenced as a second felony offender to eight years in prison, followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals, challenging only the propriety of having been sentenced as a second felony offender.
We affirm. Contrary to his contention, “ ‘County Court was not obligated to expressly advise defendant of his right to contest the constitutionality of the prior conviction’ ” ( People v. Wood, 108 A.D.3d 932, 932–933, 968 N.Y.S.2d 744 [2013], quoting People v. Smith, 121 A.D.2d 771, 772, 503 N.Y.S.2d 183 [1986] [citations omitted]; see People v. Wallace, 188 A.D.2d 499, 500, 591 N.Y.S.2d 60 [1992];People v. West, 140 A.D.2d 852, 852, 529 N.Y.S.2d 41 [1988] ). Here, the record reveals that defendant was provided with the prior felony information before sentencing and, while represented by counsel during sentencing, declined to deny or controvert any of the allegations in the information. Accordingly, County Court substantially complied with the requirements of CPL 400.21(3), and defendant was properly sentenced as a second felony offender ( see People v. Wood, 108 A.D.3d at 933, 968 N.Y.S.2d 744).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. STEIN, J.P., McCARTHY and ROSE, JJ., concur.