From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Whitaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2003-02922.

March 7, 2006.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered March 26, 2003, convicting him of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Gilbert J. West, Sr., Newburgh, N.Y., for appellant.

Francis D. Phillips II, District Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (David R. Huey of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his plea was coerced is unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to move to vacate his plea or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court ( see People v. Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636, 637; People v. Reels, 17 AD3d 488; People v. Konstantinides, 295 AD2d 537, 538-539; People v. Coles, 240 AD2d 419). Furthermore, the defendant's claim that his plea was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent because it was prompted by misrepresentations regarding the validity of a prior conviction cannot be reviewed on direct appeal since it is based on matter which is dehors the record ( see People v. Spotards, 23 AD3d 586; People v. Reels, supra at 489).


Summaries of

People v. Whitaker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 7, 2006
27 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

People v. Whitaker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JEROME WHITAKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 7, 2006

Citations

27 A.D.3d 499 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1664
810 N.Y.S.2d 343

Citing Cases

People v. Francisco

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's claim that his plea was coerced is unpreserved for…

People v. Sharma

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective…