From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Weibke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 17, 1986
119 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

April 17, 1986

Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.).


The facts underlying the instant matter are set out sufficiently in the companion case of People v. Francine CC. ( 112 A.D.2d 531), tried herewith.

Defendant contends that his conviction for assault in the second degree must be reversed since it was improperly submitted to the jury as a lesser included offense of the count for attempted murder in the second degree. Defendant was acquitted of attempted murder in the second degree and convicted of assault in the second degree as perpetrated on the victim William Hendrickson. We concur with defendant's contention (see, People v. Jansen, 118 A.D.2d 953). Assault in the second degree is not a lesser included offense of attempted murder in the second degree (see, e.g., People v. Lord, 103 A.D.2d 1032, 1033; People v Simon, 96 A.D.2d 1086, 1087). We find the prosecutor's contention that a jurisdictional predicate for the conviction exists to be untenable. Although defendant was indicted under a separate count for assault in the second degree against Hendrickson, that count of the indictment was dismissed by County Court at the close of the People's case. It follows then that the conviction for assault in the second degree against Hendrickson must be reversed.

Defendant also contends that the merger doctrine, enunciated in People v. Cassidy ( 40 N.Y.2d 763), precludes his conviction for sodomy and unlawful imprisonment in the first degree in that the latter merges with the former. We note, however, that the two crimes involved different victims. Merger would therefore be totally inappropriate in such an instance.

In addition, we find no error with regard to County Court's charge on the crime of sodomy in the first degree. Defendant contends that his conviction for sodomy precludes his conviction for aggravated sexual abuse. We note that defendant neither excepted to the charge nor made any request for submission of the charge of aggravated sexual abuse as a lesser included offense of sodomy. It follows that the issue is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 300.50; 470.05 [2]). In any event, aggravated sexual abuse is not a lesser included offense of sodomy in the first degree in that both crimes are of the same degree, i.e., class B felonies, and thus one offense cannot be a lesser included offense of the other.

Finally, defendant takes exception to County Court's charge to the jury. We find that the court adequately explained the application of the relevant law to the facts. The charge was in all respects proper.

Judgment modified, on the law, by reversing the conviction of assault in the second degree as a lesser included offense of attempted murder in the second degree and dismissing said count in the indictment, and, as so modified, affirmed. Kane, J.P., Casey, Weiss, Mikoll and Levine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Weibke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Apr 17, 1986
119 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

People v. Weibke

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERNEST WEIBKE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Apr 17, 1986

Citations

119 A.D.2d 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

People v. Reilly

A review of the record indicates that at no point did the defense counsel request that the court submit…